Dual-core processor wars: AMD vs. Intel Pentium (d) x 2

The last battle is still a good price promise to provide consumers with things better in your PC and is in the process of being a war.

Dual core at the same time, has been the point of departure a bit back to the race, see who can get the best technology, dual processor - core chip.

Single-core of battles during the last day been pattitilanteen AMD and Intel. Intel has been greater, but were not able to accommodate speeds AMD manage slower clock.

The oldest difference has been its applicability for specific tasks. AMD has been in the field of gambling, in particular, sample collected dilution air bag allows less synchronous chips that could be top speeds of overclock of the same value models. Intel is a global performance Crown. When it comes to Office workers, processors Intel is the ability to overcome the AMD chips in these areas.

Next it was the ability to higher clock chips became more and more difficult technically, you can add only in theory, allows the kernel to another processor dual core crunching number twice more. This is exactly how it works, however.

Modern operating systems and programs are designed to not feel dual or multiple-core microprocessors. They were designed to make using one processor core. Cost, which was to computers multiprocessor was necessary to split tasks between processors and sharing of cache circuitry.

Dual processor - core simply acts as a task in two places. One of the obstacles to obtaining a quota tasks up and running in two different places, as it is the case with traditional single core, one of the threads to share the nuclei. This means that every program retrieves reserved for the kernel.

It is therefore essential to increase the speed of chips dual processor - core game. Only when are the games scheduled to take advantage of dual-core processors if the difference. This is due to the intensive nature of games and intense images, which can not be distributed through multi-core processor dual core calculation requires more than one.

Let's go back to the battlefield.

AMD was the first dual-core desktop processor. This gave them a bit of an advantage over Intel. In spite of this, with AMD gave people new offering little surprise.

Always has been known to give much more than that expected for the price, these new dual-core CPUS were very expensive. Part of what AMD was able to put on hold in the past, under the control of Intel in the market was good price. This impact is gone and with consumers.

Very good value came from offers dual-processor - Intel core to increase the risk of infringing the rights of damage. Both the original dual-core processors the AMD low price model. It is correct, that the processor dual core AMD cheaper costs more than the most expensive Intel. This no doubt on the ball, which is included in a court and was a disappointment to the AMD fans.

AMD management model to better compete with cheaper quotes from Intel. In spite of this, the predecessor of Intel was still in this area.

yet performance is in the area of the information.

associated with relatively new technology, it is difficult to make a conclusion clear, is faster. only recently oriented towards fully financed by the dual - core processor technology operating systems is still new territory. Both offer better performance, but that rule the roost, we see.

In the meantime, would be likely to just watch. Beware the purchaser prefer to buy in a sure thing when things, the Act of balancing out prices are done and technologies are put into effect. Then we can have a real opinion of your disk hard earned money.