Applications medical paper presented in different categories are determined.

"Many of the articles that appear in scientific journals under the byline of prominent academics are actually written by Ghostwriters in the pay of pharmaceutical companies." "" This"are used by doctors seemingly objective article bring their care of patients often part of a marketing campaign," the Wall Street Journal reported.

The New England Journal of medicine has recently revealed that a 2000 Vioxx "omitted information about heart attacks in patients taking the drug." "Article that deletions have been someone from a Merck computer work made." One 1999 "publications strategy" preparing for Pfizer a WPP Group agency listed 81 proposed article, promotion of zoloft for everything from "Panic disorder to paedophilia." A physiologist of Elsevier's Excerpta Medica says employed was asked to "a 2002 paper in favour of a Johnson & Johnson-skewed drug". Many magazines for disclosure issues, but you say their ability to weed out ghostwriter limited. "I Don ' t give polygraph tests," said the journal of the American Medical Association's editor in Chief the Wall Street Journal.

Applications may be submitted in different categories to be determined. Each category has seven author classifications: family doctors and fellows mainly in scientific medicine, general practitioners primarily in clinical practice, family practice residents, medical students, international participants, professionals, mainly active in medical informatics and others.

According to a study estimates that almost half of all articles in journals are published by ghostwriter. While doctors who have to put their names to the papers for your reputation ' lending ' handsome can be paid the ghostwriter remain hidden. And the inclusion of the pharmaceutical companies are seldom revealed.

While many studies have shown that cyber records can reduce errors, improve care and reduce costs, the medical community is too slow move to adopt the new technology. Providers are wise because of concerns about the cost your records reluctantly, to change fears about software glitches and a mindset against radical departures in the treatment of patients.

An important contribution of the current paper is the previous econometric work of current managed care and policy environment using a nationwide sample of medical groups, responding to two surveys (1997 data) Group Management update: the compensation and production survey and the cost survey. Secondly, the rich data set provided by the MGMA surveys allows us account for a large number of potential productivity "Drivers" within the medical group role: property form, presence of monitoring mechanisms, group size, doctor specialty mix and individual physician characteristics. Thirdly this research examines a wider range of property forms and specialty types of medical group practice non-medical care single-specialty groups, health care and Multispecialty group-as previous empirical studies of the physician productivity.

In contrast, the analysis of Gaynor and Pauly (1990) and Gaynor and Gertler (1995) groups and partners hip shape of practice were restricted to basic services. Fourth Group in the MGMA sample be might differ from the wider range of specialty differential responses to financial incentives and organization design features the current study between family physicians (PCP), specialists and surgical specialists.